Gestión de mantenimiento para el área de producción de la industria Cabarvill : Estudio de taxonomía y criticidad de los equipos del área de producción de la industria Cabarvill.

Abstract

The Ecuadorian industry Cabarvill located in the Mitad del Mundo sector, is dedicated to the design, construction, and assembly of metal structures in general. Cabarvill has a wide variety of equipment and machinery necessary to conduct all the requested projects of metallic constructions, providing integral solutions, through continuous technological and process innovation, achieving benefits for customers, workers, and shareholders, with social responsibility and respect for the environment. Cabarvill is formed by the following areas: 1. Technical Department. 2. Workshop production 3. Quality 4. Transport The objective of this project is to carry out the maintenance management of the production area (workshop) in the Cabarvill industry. To achieve this objective, the taxonomy and criticality of the equipment is studied, the maintenance plan based on the Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) methodology is carried out and finally the workload balance analysis is performed. The size of the production area is 80 (m^2), it has approximately 98 pieces of equipment, and there are 7 workers that collaborate in this area. To perform the taxonomy or hierarchical classification of the equipment in the production area, the ISO 14224 standard is applied. To determine the criticality of the equipment, a quantitative method is used to classify the equipment as critical, important, and expendable. After ranking the equipment, each section was coded to obtain a code that uniquely and individually identifies the equipment corresponding to the production area of the industry. With the coding obtained, the criticality analysis was conducted using the quantitative method, which provides numerical values to the variables related to the company's performance. These values were established through a survey of information in the company and were added in a template to perform the necessary calculations and obtain the type of criticality of the equipment. At the end of both the taxonomy and the criticality, a table was made with the codification of the ninety-eight (98) equipment’s and another table with their criticality.